Updated September 2026
vs
Orion vs Safari
Short answer
Pick Orion for strong default privacy, built-in ad & tracker blocking and deep customization. Pick Safari for seamless cross-device sync, everything just working and zero-maintenance comfort.
Both belong to The KHTML dynasty. Both run on the WebKit engine, so pages render the same way in each.
| Orion | Safari | |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | WebKit | WebKit |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Platforms | macOS, iOS | macOS, iOS |
| Tracking protection | 3/3 | 2/3 |
| Built-in ad blocking | 2/3 | 1/3 |
| Customization | 1/3 | 0/3 |
| Keyboard control | 1/3 | 0/3 |
| Minimal interface | 2/3 | 2/3 |
| Fresh design | 1/3 | 1/3 |
| Raw speed | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| Battery efficiency | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| Extension ecosystem | 2/3 | 2/3 |
| Cross-device sync | 1/3 | 3/3 |
| Site compatibility | 2/3 | 3/3 |
| Low maintenance | 2/3 | 3/3 |
| Independence | 2/3 | 2/3 |
| Dev tooling | 0/3 | 1/3 |
Scores run 0–3; criteria where both score 0 are left out. How we score.
Orion
Zero-telemetry WebKit with extension superpowers.
Why it shines
- Runs many Chrome AND Firefox extensions
- Extensions on iOS — almost unheard of
- Zero telemetry, built-in ad blocking
- Easy on Apple batteries
Worth knowing
- Extension compatibility is good but not perfect
- Apple platforms only (Linux still cooking)
Safari
Apple's home advantage.
Why it shines
- Best battery efficiency on Macs and iPhones
- Intelligent Tracking Prevention on by default
- Profiles, tab groups, iCloud Private Relay
- Feels native because it is
Worth knowing
- Apple platforms only
- Smaller extension catalog
- Slower to adopt some web standards
Both ranked in
More head to heads
Still torn between Orion and Safari? The quiz ranks both — and 55 others — against what you need.
Take the quiz →